Please wait
section 10
%% LyX 2.3.2-2 created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/.
%% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing.
\documentclass[english]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,tmargin=1cm,bmargin=2cm,lmargin=1cm,rmargin=1cm}
\setlength{\parindent}{0bp}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\PassOptionsToPackage{normalem}{ulem}
\usepackage{ulem}
\makeatletter
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% User specified LaTeX commands.
\date{}
\makeatother
\usepackage{babel}
\begin{document}
\title{Fundamentals of Signal Enhancement and Array Signal Processing\\
Solution Manual}
\maketitle
\title{ \textbf{ Lidor Malul 318628005}}
\section*{ 10 Beampattern Design}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q1 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.1}
Show that the minimization of the LSE criterion yields
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{c}_N = \mathbf{M}_{\mathrm{C}}^{-1} \mathbf{v}_{\mathrm{C}}\left( \jmath \overline{f}_m \right) .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
First ,from (10.12) we know:
\[LSE({{c}_{N}})=1-v{{c}^{H}}(j{{\bar{f}}_{m}}){{c}_{N}}-c_{N}^{H}vc+c_{N}^{H}{{M}_{C}}{{c}_{N}}\]
we want to find the optimal solution for LSE :
\[ \frac{\partial LSE({{c}_{N}})}{\partial {{c}_{N}}}=0 \]
\[ \to \frac{\partial LSE({{c}_{N}})}{\partial {{c}_{N}}}=-vc(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}})-vc(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}})+2{{c}_{N}}{{M}_{C}}=0 \]
\[ \to {{c}_{N}}={{M}_{C}}^{-1}vc(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}}) \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q2 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.2}
Show that the elements of the vector $\mathbf{v}_{\mathrm{C}}\left( \jmath \overline{f}_m \right)$ are
\begin{eqnarray*}
\left[ \mathbf{v}_{\mathrm{C}}\left( \jmath \overline{f}_m \right) \right]_{n+1} = \jmath^n J_n \left( \overline{f}_m \right),
\end{eqnarray*}
where $J_n \left( z \right)$ is the Bessel function of the first kind.
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
we can write the vector vc as:
\[ vc(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}})=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{e}^{j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}}\cos \theta }}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta )d\theta } \]
\[ \to vc{{(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}})}_{n+1}}=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{e}^{j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}}\cos \theta }}\cos (n\theta )d\theta } \]
let's define:
\[{{J}_{n}}(z)\triangleq \frac{-{{j}^{-n}}}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{e}^{jz\cos \theta }}\cos (n\theta )d\theta }\]
so we can get:
\[vc{{(j{{\bar{f}}_{m}})}_{n+1}}={{j}^{n}}\cdot {{J}_{n}}({{\bar{f}}_{m}})\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q3 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.3}
Show that the elements of the matrix $\mathbf{M}_{\mathrm{C}}$ are
\begin{eqnarray*}
\left[ \mathbf{M}_{\mathrm{C}} \right]_{i+1,j+1} = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\pi}
\cos \left( i \theta \right) \cos \left( j \theta \right) d\theta .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
The matrix $M_c$ defined as following:
\[{{M}_{C}}=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta )P_{c}^{T}(\cos \theta )}d\theta \]
using $P_c$ deifinition:
\[ {{\left[ {{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta )P_{c}^{T}(\cos \theta ) \right]}_{i+1,j+1}}=\cos (i\theta )\cos (j\theta ) \]
\[ \to {{\left[ {{M}_{C}} \right]}_{i+1,j+1}}=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{\cos (i\theta )\cos (j\theta )}d\theta \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q4 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.4}
Prove the Jacobi-Anger expansion, i.e.,
\begin{eqnarray*}
e^{ \jmath \overline{f}_m \cos \theta } = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \jmath_n J_n \left( \overline{f}_m \right) \cos \left( n \theta \right),
\end{eqnarray*}
where
\begin{eqnarray*}
\jmath_n = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 1, & n=0 \\
2 \jmath^n, & n=1,2,\ldots,N \end{array} \right. .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
from 10.11 we know:
\[{{e}^{j{{f}_{m}}\cos \theta }}=\underset{N\to \infty }{\mathop{\lim }}\,\sum\limits_{n=0}^{N}{{{c}_{N}}\cos (n\theta )}\]
where,
\[ {{c}_{N}}={{[\begin{matrix}
{{c}_{0}} & {{c}_{1}} & \cdots & {{c}_{N}} \\
\end{matrix}]}^{T}} \]
\[ {{c}_{N}}={{M}_{C}}^{-1}vc(j{{{\bar{f}}}_{m}}) \]
from problem 10.2:
\[vc{{(j{{\bar{f}}_{m}})}_{n+1}}={{j}^{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{\bar{f}}_{m}})\]
from problem 10.3:
\[ {{M}_{C}}=\left( \begin{matrix}
1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\
0 & \frac{1}{2} & 0 & \vdots \\
\vdots & 0 & \ddots & 0 \\
0 & \cdots & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\
\end{matrix} \right)\to {{M}^{-1}}_{C}=\left( \begin{matrix}
1 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\
0 & 2 & 0 & \vdots \\
\vdots & 0 & \ddots & 0 \\
0 & \cdots & 0 & 2 \\
\end{matrix} \right) \]
so we get:
\[ {{c}_{N}}=\left\{ \begin{matrix}
\begin{matrix}
{{J}_{0}}({{f}_{m}}) & n=0 \\
\end{matrix} \\
\begin{matrix}
2{{j}^{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{m}}) & n\ge 1 \\
\end{matrix} \\
\end{matrix} \right. \]
subtituting all above:
\[{{e}^{j{{f}_{m}}\cos \theta }}={{J}_{0}}({{f}_{m}})+\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{2{{j}^{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{m}})\cos (n\theta )}=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty }{{{j}_{n}}\cdot {{J}_{n}}({{f}_{m}})\cos (n\theta )}\]
where,
\[{{j}_{n}}=\left\{ \begin{matrix}
\begin{matrix}
1 & n=0 \\
\end{matrix} \\
\begin{matrix}
2{{j}^{n}} & n\ge 1 \\
\end{matrix} \\
\end{matrix} \right.\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q6 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.6}
Show that with the nonrobust filter, $ \mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{NR}}(f)$, the first-order beampattern is given by
\begin{eqnarray*}
{\cal B}_{1} \left[ \mathbf{h}(f), \cos\theta \right] = H_1(f) + J_0 \left( \overline{f}_2 \right) H_2(f)
+ 2 \jmath J_1 \left( \overline{f}_2 \right) H_2(f) \cos \theta .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
let's use 10.20 with M=2:
\[ B[h(f),\cos \theta ]=\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty }{\cos (n\theta )[\sum\limits_{m=1}^{\infty }{{{j}_{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{m}}){{H}_{m}}}]}= \]
\[ =\sum\limits_{n=0}^{\infty }{\cos (n\theta )[{{j}_{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{1}}){{H}_{1}}+{{j}_{n}}{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{2}}){{H}_{2}}]}= \]
\[ ={{J}_{0}}({{f}_{1}}){{H}_{1}}(f)+{{J}_{0}}({{f}_{2}}){{H}_{2}}+\sum\limits_{n=1}^{\infty }{\cos (n\theta )}2{{j}^{n}}[{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{1}}){{H}_{1}}+{{J}_{n}}({{f}_{2}}){{H}_{2}}] \]
We know that :
\[ {{J}_{0}}({{f}_{1}})=1 \]
\[ {{J}_{n}}({{f}_{n}})=0 \]
substitute:
\[B[h(f),\cos \theta ]={{H}_{1}}(f)+{{J}_{0}}({{f}_{2}}){{H}_{2}}+\cos (\theta )2j{{J}_{1}}({{f}_{2}}){{H}_{2}}\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q8 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.8}
Show that by minimizing $J_{\mathrm{FI}} \left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right]$ subject to $\overline{\mathbf{B}}_N(f) \mathbf{h}(f) = \mathbf{b}_N$ and $\mathbf{h}^H(f) \mathbf{h}(f) = \delta_{\epsilon}$, we obtain the filter:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{FI},\epsilon}(f) = \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}^{-1}(f) \overline{\mathbf{B}}_N^H(f) \left[ \overline{\mathbf{B}}_N(f) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}^{-1}(f) \overline{\mathbf{B}}_N^H(f) \right]^{-1} \mathbf{b}_N ,
\end{eqnarray*}
where $\mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}(f) = \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C}}(f) + \epsilon \mathbf{I}_M$.
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
in order to find corresponding filter we will solve the following minimization:
\[\begin{matrix}
\min & {{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f) & subject & to & {{B}_{N}}(f)h(f)={{b}_{n}} & and & {{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)={{\delta }_{c}} \\
\end{matrix}\]
using Lagrange multiplier we defined the next function:
\[L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )=f(h)+\lambda g(h)+\varepsilon k(h)\]
where $\lambda$ and $\epsilon$ is a 1xM vector and :
\[ f(h)={{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f) \]
\[ g(h)={{B}_{N}}(f)h(f)-{{b}_{n}} \]
\[ k(h)={{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)-{{\delta }_{c}} \]
now, finding the min of L:
\[ \frac{\partial L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )}{\partial h}=0=2h(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+B_{N}^{H}(f)\lambda +2h(f)\varepsilon \]
\[ \to 2({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)h(f)=-B_{N}^{H}(f)\lambda \]
\[ \to h(f)=-\frac{1}{2}{{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}B_{N}^{H}\lambda \]
\[ \frac{\partial L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )}{\partial \lambda }=0\to {{B}_{N}}(f)h(f)={{b}_{n}}\]
\[ {{B}_{N}}(f)h(f)=-\frac{1}{2}{{B}_{N}}(f){{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}B_{N}^{H}\lambda ={{b}_{n}} \]
\[ \to \lambda =-2{{\left( {{B}_{N}}(f){{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}B_{N}^{H} \right)}^{-1}}{{b}_{n}} \]
\[ \to h(f)={{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}B_{N}^{H}{{\left( {{B}_{N}}(f){{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}B_{N}^{H} \right)}^{-1}}{{b}_{n}}= \]
\[ ={{\Gamma }_{c,\varepsilon }}^{-1}(f)B_{N}^{H}{{\left( {{B}_{N}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c,\varepsilon }}^{-1}(f)B_{N}^{H} \right)}^{-1}}{{b}_{n}} \]
where,
\[{{\Gamma }_{c,\varepsilon }}^{-1}(f)\triangleq {{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q9 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.9}
Show that the LSE between the array beampattern and the desired directivity pattern can be written as
\begin{align*}
\mathrm{LSE}\left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right] &= \mathbf{h}^H(f) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C}}(f) \mathbf{h}(f) -
\mathbf{h}^H(f) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathbf{d}\mathbf{p}_{\mathrm{C}}}(f) \mathbf{b}_N - \nonumber \\
& ~~~~~ \mathbf{b}_N^T \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathbf{d}\mathbf{p}_{\mathrm{C}}}^H(f) \mathbf{h}(f)
+ \mathbf{b}_N^T \mathbf{M}_{\mathrm{C}} \mathbf{b}_N.
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
let's remember the definition of LSE:
\[LSE[h(f)]=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta }\]
where,
\[ {{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}={{\left| {{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)-{{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}} \right|}^{2}}= \]
\[ =\left( {{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta )-b_{N}^{H}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ) \right)\left( {{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)-{{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}} \right)= \]
\[ ={{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)-{{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}}-b_{N}^{H}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)+ \]
\[ +b_{N}^{H}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}} \]
substituting:
\[ LSE[h(f)]=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta }= \]
\[ =\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)d\theta }-\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}}d\theta }- \]
\[ -\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{b_{N}^{H}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)d\theta }+\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{b_{N}^{H}{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta ){{b}_{N}}d\theta }= \]
\[ ={{h}^{H}}(f)\left[ \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{d(f,\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )d\theta } \right]h(f)-{{h}^{H}}(f)\left[ \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{d(f,\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta )d\theta } \right]{{b}_{N}}- \]
\[ -b_{N}^{H}\left[ \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )d\theta } \right]h(f)+b_{N}^{H}\left[ \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta )d\theta } \right]{{b}_{N}} \]
using the following definitions:
\[ {{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)\triangleq \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{d(f,\cos \theta ){{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )d\theta } \]
\[ {{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f)\triangleq \frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{d(f,\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta )d\theta } \]
\[ {{M}_{C}}\overset{\wedge}{=}\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{P}_{c}}(\cos \theta ){{P}_{c}}^{T}(\cos \theta )d\theta } \]
so,
\[LSE[h(f)]={{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f)-{{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-b_{N}^{H}\Gamma _{dpc}^{H}(f)h(f)+b_{N}^{H}{{M}_{C}}{{b}_{N}}\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q10 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.10}
Show that by minimizing the LSE with a constraint on the coefficients, we obtain the regularized LS filter:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{LS},\epsilon}(f) = \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}^{-1}(f) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathbf{d}\mathbf{p}_{\mathrm{C}}}(f) \mathbf{b}_N .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
in order to find the LS filter we will solve the following minimization:
\[ \begin{matrix}
\min & {{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f)-{{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-{{b}_{N}}^{H}(f){{\Gamma }^{H}}_{dpc}(f)h(f)+{{b}_{N}}^{T}{{M}_{c}}{{b}_{N}} \\
\end{matrix} \]
\[ \begin{matrix}
subject & to & {{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)={{\delta }_{c}} \\
\end{matrix} \]
using Lagrange multiplier we defined the next function:
\[L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )=f(h)+\varepsilon g(h)\]
where $\epsilon$ is a 1xM vector and :
\[\ f(h)={{h}^{H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f) \]
\[ g(h)={{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)-{{\delta }_{c}} \]
now, finding the min of L:
\[ \frac{\partial L(h,\varepsilon )}{\partial h}=0\to 2{{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f)-{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}+2\varepsilon h(f) \]
\[ \to 2({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)h(f)=2{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}} \]
\[ \to {{h}_{LS,e}}={{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}={{\Gamma }_{c,\varepsilon }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}} \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q11 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.11}
Show that by minimizing the LSE subject to the distortionless constraint and a constraint on the coefficients, we obtain the regularized CLS filter:
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{CLS},\epsilon}(f) &= \mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{LS},\epsilon}(f) -
\frac{1 - \mathbf{d}^H\left(f,1 \right) \mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{LS},\epsilon}(f) }
{ \mathbf{d}^H\left(f,1 \right) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}^{-1}(f) \mathbf{d}\left(f,1 \right) }
\mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathrm{C},\epsilon}^{-1}(f) \mathbf{d}\left(f,1 \right) .
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
in order to find the CLS filter we will solve the following minimization:
\[\begin{matrix}
\min & LSE{{\left| \varepsilon \right|}^{2}} & subject & to & {{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta )=1 & and & {{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)={{\delta }_{c}} \\
\end{matrix}\]
using Lagrange multiplier we defined the next function:
\[L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )=f(h)+\lambda g(h)+\varepsilon k(h)\]
where $\lambda$ and $\epsilon$ is a 1xM vector and
\[ f(h)=LSE[h(f)] \]
\[ g(h)={{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta )-1 \]
\[ k(h)={{h}^{H}}(f)h(f)-{{\delta }_{c}} \]
now, finding the min of L:
\[ \frac{\partial L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )}{\partial h}=0\to 2{{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)h(f)-{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}+2\varepsilon h(f)+\lambda d(f,\cos \theta ) \]
\[ \to 2({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)h(f)=2{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\lambda d(f,\cos \theta ) \]
\[ \to {{h}_{CLS}}={{({{\Gamma }_{c}}(f)+\varepsilon I)}^{-1}}[{{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\frac{1}{2}\lambda d(f,\cos \theta )]={{h}_{LS,e}}(f)-\frac{1}{2}\lambda {{\Gamma }^{-1}}_{c,e}d(f,\cos \theta ) \]
\[ \frac{\partial L(h,\lambda ,\varepsilon )}{\partial \lambda }=0\to {{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta )=1\to {{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)=1 \]
\[ {{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta )h(f)={{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{h}_{LS,e}}(f)-\frac{1}{2}\lambda {{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{\Gamma }^{-1}}_{c,e}d(f,\cos \theta )=1 \]
\[ \to \lambda =-2\frac{1-{{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{h}_{LS,e}}(f)}{{{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{\Gamma }^{-1}}_{c,e}d(f,\cos \theta )} \]
\[ \to {{h}_{CLS}}={{h}_{LS,e}}(f)+\frac{1-{{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{h}_{LS,e}}(f)}{{{d}^{H}}(f,\cos \theta ){{\Gamma }^{-1}}_{c,e}d(f,\cos \theta )}{{\Gamma }^{-1}}_{c,e}d(f,\cos \theta ) \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q12 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.12}
Show that with the constraint $\overline{\mathbf{B}}_N(f) \mathbf{h}(f) = \mathbf{b}_N$, the error signal between the array beampattern and the desired directivity pattern can be expressed as
\begin{align*}
{\cal E}\left[ \mathbf{h}(f), \cos \theta \right] &= \sum_{i=N+1}^{\infty} \cos \left( i \theta \right) \overline{\mathbf{b}}_i^T(f) \mathbf{h}(f).
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
from 10.55 we know:
\[ \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ]=\sum\limits_{i=0}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}-\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{N,i}}}= \]
\[ =\sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}+\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}-\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{N,i}}} \]
using the following constraint:
\[ {{B}_{N}}(f)h(f)={{b}_{N}} \]
\[ \to {{b}_{i}}^{T}h(f)={{{\bar{b}}}_{N,i}} \]
substituting:
\[ \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ]=\sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}+\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}-\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}= \]
\[ =\sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{{\bar{b}}}_{i}}^{T}h(f)} \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q13 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.13}
Using the orthogonality property of the Chebyshev polynomials, show that the criterion $J_{\mathrm{FI}} \left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right]$ can be expressed as
\begin{align*}
J_{\mathrm{FI}} \left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right] &= \mathrm{LSE}\left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right] +
\frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\pi} \left| {\cal B}\left( \mathbf{b}_N, \cos \theta \right) \right|^2 d\theta ,
\end{align*}
where
\begin{align*}
\mathrm{LSE}\left[ \mathbf{h}(f) \right] &= \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{0}^{\pi} \left|
\sum_{i=N+1}^{\infty} \cos \left( i \theta \right) \overline{\mathbf{b}}_i^T(f) \mathbf{h}(f) \right|^2 d\theta .
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
first we know that:
\[LSE[h(f)]=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta }=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{i}}^{T}h(f)} \right|}^{2}}d\theta }\]
now, using 10.56 the criterion defined in 10.40 can be expressed as:
\[{{J}_{FI}}[h(f)]=\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ]+B[{{b}_{N}},\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta =}\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{i}}^{T}h(f)}+\sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{N,i}}} \right|}^{2}}d\theta }\]
using the orthogonality property:
\[\begin{matrix}
\int_{0}^{\pi }{\cos (i\theta )\cos (j\theta )d\theta =0} & i\ne j \\
\end{matrix}\]
and now:
\[ {{J}_{FI}}[h(f)]=\frac{1}{\pi }{{\int_{0}^{\pi }{\left| \sum\limits_{i=N+1}^{\infty }{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{i}}^{T}h(f)} \right|}}^{2}}d\theta +\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| \sum\limits_{i=0}^{N}{\cos (i\theta ){{b}_{N,i}}} \right|}^{2}}d\theta }= \]
\[ =\frac{1}{\pi }{{\int_{0}^{\pi }{\left| \varepsilon [h(f),\cos \theta ] \right|}}^{2}}d\theta +\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| B[{{b}_{N}},\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta } \]
\[ \to {{J}_{FI}}[h(f)]=LSE[h(f)]+\frac{1}{\pi }\int_{0}^{\pi }{{{\left| B[{{b}_{N}},\cos \theta ] \right|}^{2}}d\theta } \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q14 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.14}
Show that the filters defined in (\ref{C10-filt-hM}) preserve the nulls of $\mathbf{h}'(f) = \mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{NR}}(f)$, i.e., if $\theta_0$ is a null of $\mathbf{h}'(f)$, then
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{h}^H(f) \mathbf{d}\left(f, \cos \theta_0 \right) =
\mathbf{g}^H(f) \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f, \cos \theta_0 \right) \times 0 = 0 ,
\end{eqnarray*}
where
\begin{align*}
\widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f, \cos \theta_0 \right) &= \left[ \begin{array}{cccc}
1 & e^{-\jmath 2\pi f \tau_0 \cos \theta_0 } & \cdots & e^{-\jmath (M-N-1) 2\pi f \tau_0 \cos \theta_0 } \end{array} \right]^T .
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
we know the form of h is:
\[h(f)={{H}^{'}}(f)g(f)\to {{h}^{H}}(f)={{g}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f)\]
let's define:
\[\tilde{d}(f,\cos \theta )\triangleq d(f,\cos \theta ){{H}^{'H}}={{[\begin{matrix}
1 & {{e}^{-j2\pi f{{\tau }_{0}}\cos \theta }} & \cdots & {{e}^{-j(M-N-1)2\pi f{{\tau }_{0}}\cos \theta }} \\
\end{matrix}]}^{T}}\]
if ${{\theta }_{0}}$ is a null of $h'(f)={{h}_{NR}}(f)$ so:
\[{{h}^{H}}(f)d(f,\cos \theta )={{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,\cos {{\theta }_{0}})\times 0=0\]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q15 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.15}
Show that by maximizing the WNG subject to the distortionless constraint, we obtain the MWNG filter:
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{h}_{\mathrm{MWNG}}(f) =
\frac{\mathbf{H}'(f) \left[ \mathbf{H}'^H(f) \mathbf{H}'(f) \right]^{-1} \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f,1 \right) }
{ \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}^H\left(f,1 \right) \left[ \mathbf{H}'^H(f) \mathbf{H}'(f) \right]^{-1}
\widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f,1 \right) } .
\end{eqnarray*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
in order to find the MWNG filter we will solve the following minimization:
\[\begin{matrix}
\min & {{g}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f)H'(f)g(f) & subject & to & {{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)=1 \\
\end{matrix}\]
using Lagrange multiplier we defined the next function:
\[L(g,\lambda )=f(g)+\lambda k(g)\]
where $\lambda$ is a 1xM vector and
\[ f(g)={{g}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f)H'(f)g(f) \]
\[ k(g)={{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)-1 \]
now, finding the min of L:
\[ \frac{\partial L(g,\lambda )}{\partial g}=0=2{{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)g(f)+\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \]
\[ \to g(f)=-\frac{1}{2}{{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \]
\[ \frac{\partial L(g,\lambda )}{\partial \lambda }=0\to {{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)=1\to {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1)g(f)=1 \]
\[ {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1)g(f)=-\frac{1}{2}{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda =1 \]
\[ \to \lambda =-\frac{2}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
\[ \to {{g}_{MWNG}}(f)=\frac{{{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
use the form of h(f):
\[ h(f)={{H}^{'H}}(f)g(f) \]
\[ \to {{h}_{MWNG}}(f)=\frac{{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{\left[ {{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%% Q16 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\subsection*{10.16}
Show that by minimizing $J_{\aleph}\left[ \mathbf{g}(f) \right]$ subject to the distortionless constraint, we obtain the tradeoff filter:
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{g}_{\mathrm{T},\aleph}(f) &= \mathbf{g}_{\mathrm{U},\aleph}(f) +
\frac{1 - \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}^H\left(f,1 \right) \mathbf{g}_{\mathrm{U},\aleph}(f)}
{\widetilde{\mathbf{d}}^H\left(f,1 \right) \mathbf{R}_{\aleph}^{-1}(f) \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f,1 \right)}
\mathbf{R}_{\aleph}^{-1}(f) \widetilde{\mathbf{d}}\left(f,1 \right),
\end{align*}
where
\begin{eqnarray*}
\mathbf{g}_{\mathrm{U},\aleph}(f) = \aleph \mathbf{R}_{\aleph}^{-1}(f) \mathbf{H}'^H(f) \mathbf{\Gamma}_{\mathbf{d}\mathbf{p}_{\mathrm{C}}}(f) \mathbf{b}_N
\end{eqnarray*}
is the unconstrained filter obtained by minimizing $J_{\aleph}\left[ \mathbf{g}(f) \right]$ and
\begin{align*}
\mathbf{R}_{\aleph}(f) &= \aleph \mathbf{R}(f) + (1-\aleph) \mathbf{H}'^H(f) \mathbf{H}'(f) .
\end{align*}
\textbf{\uline{Solution}}\textbf{:}
in order to find the tradeoff filter we will solve the following minimization:
\[\min \text{ }\aleph LSE[g(f)]+\left( 1-\aleph \right){{\text{g}}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)\text{g}(f)\text{ }subject\text{ }to\text{ }{{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)=1\text{ }\]
using Lagrange multiplier we defined the next function:
\[L(g,\lambda )=f(g)+\lambda k(g)\]
where $\lambda$ is a 1xM vector and
\[ f(g)=\aleph LSE[g(f)]+\left( 1-\aleph \right){{\text{g}}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)\text{g}(f) \]
\[ k(g)={{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)-1 \]
we know:
\[LSE\left[ g(f) \right]={{\text{g}}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{C}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)\text{g}(f)-{{\text{g}}^{H}}(f){{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-b_{N}^{T}\Gamma _{dpc}^{H}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)\text{g}(f)+b_{N}^{T}{{M}_{c}}{{b}_{N}}\]
now, finding the min of L:
\[\frac{\partial L(g,\lambda )}{\partial g}=0=\aleph \left[ 2\left( {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{C}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right)g(f)-{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}} \right]+ \]
\[ +2\left( 1-\aleph \right){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f)\text{g}(f)+\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda =0 \]
\[ \to \left[ 2\aleph \left( {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{C}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right)+2\left( 1-\aleph \right){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]g(f)=2\aleph {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \]
\[ \to g(f)={{\left[ \aleph \left( {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{C}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right)+\left( 1-\aleph \right){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\left[ \aleph {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\frac{1}{2}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \right] \]
we know from 10.76:
\[ R(f)={{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{C}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \]
\[ \to g(f)={{\left[ \aleph R(f)+\left( 1-\aleph \right){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \right]}^{-1}}\left[ \aleph {{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\frac{1}{2}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \right] \]
let's dfine:
\[ {{R}_{\aleph }}(f)\triangleq \aleph R(f)+\left( 1-\aleph \right){{H}^{'H}}(f){{H}^{'}}(f) \]
\[ \to g(f)=\aleph {{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\frac{1}{2}{{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \]
find $\lambda$ :
\[ \frac{\partial L(g,\lambda )}{\partial \lambda }=0\to {{g}^{H}}(f)\tilde{d}(f,1)=1\to {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1)g(f)=1 \]
\[ {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1)g(f)=\aleph {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}-\frac{1}{2}{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\lambda \]
\[ \to \lambda =-2\frac{1-\aleph {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
substituting
\[ \to {{g}_{T,\aleph }}(f)=\aleph {{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}+{{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\frac{1-\aleph {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
define:
\[\ {{g}_{U,\aleph }}(f)\triangleq \aleph {{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}} \]
\[ \to {{g}_{T,\aleph }}(f)={{g}_{U,\aleph }}(f)+{{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)\frac{1-\aleph {{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}{{H}^{'H}}(f){{\Gamma }_{dpc}}(f){{b}_{N}}}{{{{\tilde{d}}}^{H}}(f,1){{R}_{\aleph }}{{(f)}^{-1}}\tilde{d}(f,1)} \]
\[
\blacksquare
\]
\end{document}
Our gallery is the easiest way to put your LaTeX templates, examples and articles online. Just create a free project and use the publish menu. It only takes a couple of clicks!
The LaTeX templates, examples and articles in the Overleaf gallery all come from our amazing community.
New content is added all the time. Follow us on twitter for the highlights!